Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is a bit better than iPhone X's 88.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a noticeably thinner but extremely heavier phone than the iPhone X. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a bit better screen than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a much larger display, a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels and way more display brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone X, because it has more internal memory. The iPhone X counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a camera with a lot higher 200 mega pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than iPhone X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as iPhone X. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the iPhone X, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.