Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than Apple iPhone XR, getting a 91.1 score against 82. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is somewhat heavier but thinner than the Apple iPhone XR. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a better display than Apple iPhone XR, because it has way more brightness, a bit more pixels per screen inch, a lot higher 1968 x 2184 resolution and a really larger display.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. IPhone XR has a much better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (although faster) and 13 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much longer battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than iPhone XR, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone XR. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the iPhone XR, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.