Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is just a bit better than iPhone XS's score of 84.2. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a thinner but incredibly heavier cellphone than iPhone XS. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit better screen than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a really larger screen, much more brightness and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The iPhone XS counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has 2 lesser cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 65 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the iPhone XS, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone XS. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save some money and get the iPhone XS, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.