Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black glare |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone 3, having a 91.1 score against 86.3. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition body is a little lighter and much thinner than the Asus ROG Phone 3. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a little more vivid screen than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display, a higher 1968 x 2184 resolution and way more brightness. The Asus ROG Phone 3 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior memory for apps and games than Asus ROG Phone 3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a really longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.