Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than the Asus ROG Phone 8, with a overall score of 91.1 against 79.5. These phones work with the same Android 14 OS (operating system). The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition construction is a bit heavier but notably thinner than Asus ROG Phone 8. Asus ROG Phone 8 has a screen that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although the Asus ROG Phone 8 has a bit opaque screen, a bit smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little greater pixels number in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Asus ROG Phone 8, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a bit better hardware performance than Asus ROG Phone 8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 has a better camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera with a much worse resolution and a smaller camera aperture. The Asus ROG Phone 8 has improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.