Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a general score of 91.1 against 80.7. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a much thinner but a lot heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3 XL. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a much lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher 1968 x 2184 resolution and a larger screen.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a very superior CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a much higher resolution camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3 XL, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.