Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a 91.1 score against 82.9. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's body is somewhat heavier but incredibly thinner than Google Pixel 4 XL. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a little bit lower 1968 x 2184 resolution and a much worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4 XL. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.