Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a bit better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, getting a global score of 91.1 against 87.5. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has newer 14 version while Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition body is incredibly heavier but noticeably thinner than the Google Pixel 4a 5G.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much faster CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better 1968 x 2184 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4a 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.