Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than LG G7 Fit, getting a 91.1 score against 77. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the previous 14 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a noticeably thinner but extremely heavier cellphone than the LG G7 Fit.
LG G7 Fit counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a much smaller display and much more opaque display, it also counts with a much better pixel amount per inch in the screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG G7 Fit counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 4 less cpu cores and less RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior camera than LG G7 Fit, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light situations and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a way better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.