Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than LG G7 ThinQ's overall score of 81. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a much heavier but noticeably thinner phone than the LG G7 ThinQ.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has much worse brightness and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and way more pixels per inch of display. LG G7 ThinQ features a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save some money and get the LG G7 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.