Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than LG G8X ThinQ, with a overall score of 91.1 against 82.7. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a newer 14 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, giving a couple additional features. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a extremely thinner but heavier cellphone than LG G8X ThinQ.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a higher 1968 x 2184 resolution and a larger screen. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way better performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit superior battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots just a bit better photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G8X ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy LG G8X ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.