Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 score. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a incredibly thinner but notably heavier cellphone than the LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior processor than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower pixel density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a bit higher 1968 x 2184 resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features improved battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.