Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is a bit better than LG Velvet's score of 87.1. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a way heavier but extremely thinner phone than the LG Velvet. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than LG Velvet, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. LG Velvet counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The LG Velvet shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lot less MP camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Velvet. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG Velvet, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.