Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's 91.1 score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG Wing has the older 10 version while Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14. The LG Wing is a a little bit heavier and way thicker cellphone than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
The LG Wing features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels.
The LG Wing features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Wing counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera in the back with a much lower 64 MP resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features just a bit better battery performance than LG Wing, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
LG Wing not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.