Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a general score of 91.1 against 87.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a somewhat heavier but incredibly thinner cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 14 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit opaque screen and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit better display pixels density. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's memory capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition one, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.