Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than Motorola One Vision, having a 91.1 score against 80.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is notably thinner but incredibly heavier than Motorola One Vision. The Motorola One Vision features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184 pixels. Motorola One Vision counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features superior battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.