Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than Motorola One Zoom's score of 80. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is noticeably thinner but somewhat heavier than the Motorola One Zoom. Motorola One Zoom counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184px. The Motorola One Zoom captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has much more memory for applications and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features just a little better battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Zoom. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Zoom, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.