Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), having a overall score of 91.1 against 87. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version and Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a notably thinner but heavier device than Motorola razr (2020).
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with an extremely better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way better 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a much worse 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a way better battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola razr (2020), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola razr (2020). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Motorola razr (2020), resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.