Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black Shadow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, getting a 91.3 score against 91.1. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body is way thicker but somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit inferior pixels count per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52 5G features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A52 5G shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera with a much lower 64 megapixels resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.