Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than the Galaxy A70, having a 91.1 score against 76.9. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10, counting with some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is noticeably heavier but incredibly thinner than the Galaxy A70.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and videos in low-light situations. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A70 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy A70, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.