Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's score of 91.1. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a noticeably thicker but a lot lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a way better performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels, they both have a same size aperture.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.