Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's 91.1 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is somewhat lighter but thicker than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a way worse screen density and a little bit worse resolution of 1968 x 2184, it also counts with a larger screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.