Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than the Galaxy Note3, having a score of 91.1 against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has older 14 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a a lot thinner but notably heavier device than the Galaxy Note3.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a really larger display and a way higher 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note3 counts with a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a camera with a way better 200 MP resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.