Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a general score of 91.1, which is better than Galaxy Note7's 79.5 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a incredibly thinner but notably heavier cellphone than Galaxy Note7. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a lot lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1968 x 2184 and a lot larger display.
Galaxy Note7 has a very superior performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.