Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, getting a global score of 93.6 against 91.1. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a somewhat lighter but notably thicker cellphone than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a much worse pixels density and a little bit lower 1968 x 2184px resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy S10 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.