Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's score of 91.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version and Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14. Galaxy S20 is a noticeably lighter but incredibly thicker device than the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
The Galaxy S20 has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1968 x 2184 and a way lower amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a much more MP back facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S20 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.