Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's 91.1 score. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is much thicker but just a bit lighter than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a much lower screen density and a quite lower resolution of 1968 x 2184, it also counts with a bigger screen. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.