Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is way better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a score of 91.1 against 75.8. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is extremely heavier but incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 lesser cpu cores (although faster).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a much worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution, a really bigger display and much more brightness. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera with much more MP. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a little better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.