Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black Shadow | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a general score of 91.1, which is better than Xperia XZ2 Premium's overall score of 82.2. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design has the same weight than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, but it is way thinner. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has much less brightness and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better number of pixels per display inch and a better 2160 x 3840 resolution.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a much more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features longer battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xperia XZ2 Premium. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save some dollars and get the Xperia XZ2 Premium, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.