Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A3's score of 79.2. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a much thinner but extremely heavier device than the Xiaomi Mi A3. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a way higher 1968 x 2184 resolution, a higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a way bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a much less mega-pixels camera in the back, they both have a same size aperture. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features just a little bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 9 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.