Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having a overall score of 91.1 against 87.9. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a a little bit heavier but notably thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a just a little lower pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184, a larger display and a way brighter display.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and a much less MP resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.