Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is better than Xiaomi Poco X2's global score of 79.3. These devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11, giving you a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition body is incredibly thinner but heavier than Xiaomi Poco X2.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a higher 1968 x 2184 resolution and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos and a much worse 64 megapixels resolution camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.