Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black Shadow | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2020.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2184 x 1968 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's 81.1 score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10, so it provides you a lot of extra features. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a much thinner but heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a higher 1968 x 2184 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 14% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.