Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-03-23 | 2016-10-20 |
| 4.82 x 2.53 x 0.39 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.16 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 7.2 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.6 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 750 hours standby time 12.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is way better than Samsung I9000B, having a score of 80.2 against 53.6. Google Pixel is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Samsung I9000B, but it is heavier. The Google Pixel counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung I9000B, because it has more processing cores.
Google Pixel counts with a more vivid display than Samsung I9000B, because it has a larger screen, a lot more pixels per display inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 1920. The Google Pixel shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung I9000B, because it has a lot higher video quality and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Google Pixel has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung I9000B, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel features a much longer battery duration than Samsung I9000B, because it has a 2770mAh battery capacity against 1500mAh.
Google Pixel costs a little more money than the Samsung I9000B, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.