Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2010-03-23 | 2019-12-27 |
| 4.82 x 2.53 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.16 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.2 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.6 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 750 hours standby time 12.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is way better than the Samsung I9000B, with a general score of 85.5 against 53.6. The Galaxy A51 construction is newer and thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Samsung I9000B. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Samsung I9000B has Android 2.1, so it provides you a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy A51 counts with a much better hardware performance than Samsung I9000B, because it has a larger number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a sharper display than Samsung I9000B, because it has much more pixels per inch in the screen, a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a way bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung I9000B, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 112 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A51 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung I9000B, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
The Galaxy A51 features a very superior camera than Samsung I9000B, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.