Search


Compare phones

Global Score
37.140.7
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--Symbian 9.3
--2010-03-02
4.41 x 2.12 x 0.57 inches4.41 x 1.81 x 0.48 inches
4.06 ounces3.15 ounces
--Gray and White
$ 180.00$ 159.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
LCDTFT
167 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.86.5
processorARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.75
Storage
--51,2 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
1.321.4
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP + 0.30 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.845.94
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.11.1
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1050mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
630 hours standby time
12 hours talk time
2.562.64
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

The Nokia C5 is just a bit better than the Samsung Intensity III, with a 40.7 score against 37.1. Nokia C5 is a thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than the Samsung Intensity III. The Nokia C5 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Intensity III, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240px, the Nokia C5 also counts with a bit better pixel quantity per screen inch.

Nokia C5 has slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Intensity III, although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 16 GB smaller. Nokia C5 features a superior hardware performance than Samsung Intensity III, because it has a higher number of cores.

The Nokia C5 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Intensity III, because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Nokia C5 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Intensity III, because it has a 1050mAh battery size.

The Nokia C5 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.