Compare phones
Samsung Knack
SCH-U310| Global Score | |
| 29.8 | 32 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | 2009-05-18 |
| 3.78 x 2.01 x 0.74 inches | 3.66 x 1.81 x 0.70 inches |
| 3.63 ounces | 3.19 ounces |
| -- | Black and Red |
| $ 260.00 | $ 195.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 128 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 336 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 432 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2720 fold is a little bit better than the Samsung Knack, getting a general score of 32 against 29.8. Nokia 2720 fold's design is a little thinner and lighter than Samsung Knack. Samsung Knack and Nokia 2720 fold count with very similar CPUs, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit. Samsung Knack has a slightly better screen than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has a higher 220 x 176px resolution, a bigger screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Nokia 2720 fold has a much better camera than Samsung Knack. Nokia 2720 fold has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Knack. Samsung Knack features better battery duration than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity against 860mAh.
The Nokia 2720 fold is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.