Search


Compare phones

Global Score
39.538.4
Basic Information
SamsungMotorola
2012-10-152008-11-18
3.84 x 1.99 x 0.72 inches4.06 x 1.95 x 0.60 inches
3.70 ounces3.88 ounces
$ 65.00$ 65.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.2 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
LCDTFT
167 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.96.1
Performance
Qualcomm QSC6155 chipset--
Single-Core 480 MHz processor processor
128 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
6.575.76
Storage
--112,64 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
00.6
Camera
1.30 MP5.00 MP
4.515.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--EDGE and GSM
--SIM
02.7
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery810mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
6.7 hours talk time
2.562.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0Bluetooth 2.0
GPS--

Comparison review

Samsung M400 has a global score of 39.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola MOTO VE66's 38.4 overall score. Although the Samsung M400 is thicker than the Motorola MOTO VE66, it's just a little bit lighter and also incredibly newer. The Samsung M400 counts with a superior performance than Motorola MOTO VE66, because it has 1 more CPU cores.

Motorola MOTO VE66 has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung M400, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 320 x 240 resolution, the Motorola MOTO VE66 also counts with a quite higher pixel density. The MOTO VE66 captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung M400, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.

MOTO VE66 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung M400. The Samsung M400 features longer battery life than MOTO VE66, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.

Samsung M400 costs the same than MOTO VE66, which makes it a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.