Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
64 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 41.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2010-02-09 | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.28 x 2.11 x 0.49 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.25 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 319.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 400 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 155 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 204,8 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.8 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.72 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.5 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 769 hours standby time 9.7 hours talk time | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.1, which is a lot better than Samsung Monte S5620's overall score of 41.5. The Galaxy Note 3 design is much newer and much thinner, but also a lot heavier than the Samsung Monte S5620. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a way better looking screen than Samsung Monte S5620, because it has a way larger screen, a way better amount of pixels per display inch and a way higher 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Galaxy Note 3 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Monte S5620, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB and 63,8 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a lot better performance than Samsung Monte S5620, because it has a greater number of faster cores and an additional graphics processor.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a way better battery duration than Samsung Monte S5620, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Note 3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Monte S5620, because it has a much better 13 MP resolution back facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 3 costs a bit more than the Samsung Monte S5620, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.