Global Score | |
36.4 | 39.4 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Nokia |
-- | Symbian 9.4 |
2008-09-10 | 2009-08-25 |
4.50 x 2.10 x 0.70 inches | 4.37 x 2.04 x 0.61 inches |
4.58 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
$ 170.00 | $ 110.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2.1 inches | 3.2 inches |
176 x 220 pixels | 360 x 640 pixels |
TFT | TFT |
134 pixels per inch | 229 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | Resistive |
5.7 | 6.9 |
processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor |
-- | 128 MB RAM |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 6.48 |
Storage | |
32,77 MB internal memory | 71,68 MB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
0.4 | 1.5 |
Camera | |
2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
-- | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
4.73 | 5.28 |
CDMA | HSDPA, UMTS and GSM |
-- | SIM |
0.1 | 0.7 |
Battery Life | |
960mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1320mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
5.6 hours talk time | 438 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
2.48 | 3.04 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
GPS | GPS |
-- | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
Nokia 5230 is a little bit better than Samsung Rant, with a global score of 39.4 against 36.4. Nokia 5230 is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Rant. Nokia 5230 has an incredibly better display than Samsung Rant, because it has a much better pixel amount per screen inch, a lot better 640 x 360 resolution and a really larger screen.
Nokia 5230 has a superior processing power than Samsung Rant, because it has a greater number of cores. Nokia 5230 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Rant. They have a same resolution back camera. The Nokia 5230 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Rant, because it has 71,68 MB internal storage capacity.
Nokia 5230 counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Rant, because it has a 1320mAh battery size instead of 960mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Nokia 5230 is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.