Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.839.7
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
2009-08-062011-03-08
3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches4.33 x 2.39 x 0.46 inches
3.50 ounces3.60 ounces
--Pink, White and Yellow
$ 90.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
2.6 inches3.1 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
154 pixels per inch129 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
5.95.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--26,62 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.3
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
--320 x 240 (30 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.735.17
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.12.7
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
6 hours talk time620 hours standby time
9.5 hours talk time
2.562.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 3.0
GPS--

Comparison review

Samsung Corby II has a general score of 39.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Reclaim's 36.8 score. Samsung Corby II's design is newer and incredibly thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Samsung Reclaim. Samsung Corby II's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in Samsung Reclaim, both have the same number of cores.

Samsung Reclaim features a slightly better display than Samsung Corby II, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 240 x 320px, the Samsung Reclaim also counts with a just a little better display density. Samsung Corby II features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Reclaim.

The Samsung Corby II counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Reclaim. Both have the same resolution back facing camera. Samsung Corby II and Samsung Reclaim feature really similar battery durations.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Corby II is also a bit cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.