Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.837.9
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
2009-08-062010-06-23
3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches4.60 x 2.11 x 0.60 inches
3.50 ounces4.34 ounces
$ 90.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.6 inches--
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
154 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.95.8
processor Single-Core 184 MHz processor
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
--71,68 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.5
Camera
2.00 MP2.00 MP
4.734.73
CDMAHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.9
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
6 hours talk time400 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.562.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

The Samsung Gravity 3 has a score of 37.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Reclaim's 36.8 general score. Even though Samsung Gravity 3 is newer than the Samsung Reclaim, it's just a little bit thicker and heavier. Samsung Reclaim counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Gravity 3, although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower.

Samsung Reclaim features a slightly better screen than Samsung Gravity 3, and although they both have an equal 240 x 320 resolution, the Samsung Reclaim also has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Gravity 3's camera is just as good as the camera in Samsung Reclaim, both have a same resolution back camera.

The Samsung Gravity 3 counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Reclaim. The Samsung Gravity 3 features a battery performance that is very similar to Samsung Reclaim's battery performance.

The Samsung Gravity 3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.