Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.840.4
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
2009-08-062011-01-18
3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches
3.50 ounces3.32 ounces
$ 90.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
2.6 inches3 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
154 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
5.95.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.735.39
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.12.7
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
6 hours talk time900 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
2.562.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 3.0
GPS--
--Accelerometer

Comparison review

Samsung Star II is slightly better than the Samsung Reclaim, getting a 40.4 score against 36.8. The Samsung Star II is a newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Reclaim. Samsung Star II features a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Reclaim one, although the Samsung Star II also has a little bit higher resolution of 400 x 240, a just a little better screen density and a bigger display.

Samsung Star II's processor is just as good as the CPU in Samsung Reclaim, both of them have the same number of cores. Samsung Star II features a better camera than Samsung Reclaim, because it has a camera with a way higher 3.2 MP resolution. Samsung Star II has a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Reclaim.

The Samsung Star II features a battery duration that is very similar to the Samsung Reclaim one.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Star II is also cheaper than the Samsung Reclaim.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.