Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.6, 2.3, 2.2 | -- |
| 2011-04-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.84 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.10 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Pink | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 210.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7627-2 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.84 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 217 hours standby time 5.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than Samsung Replenish's score of 47.6. Galaxy A50's body is a lot newer and notably thinner than Samsung Replenish's, but it is also much heavier. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Replenish, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a way higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a way larger display.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Replenish, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy A50 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Replenish, because it has a back camera with a lot higher 25 MP resolution. Galaxy A50 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Replenish, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Replenish, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 1600mAh.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.