Search


Compare phones

Samsung Galaxy S III

16 GB U.S. Cellular
SCH-I535
Global Score
41.970.8
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4
2012-11-292012-06-04
4.10 x 2.10 x 0.80 inches5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches
4.70 ounces4.70 ounces
--Black, Blue, Brown and White
--Polycarbonate
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 105.00$ 110.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches4.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)720 x 1280 pixels (HD)
--Super AMOLED
167 pixels per inch306 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.18.2
Performance
STE PNX6809L chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset
Single-Core 468 MHz processorKrait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor
128 MB RAM2 GB (500 MHz) RAM
GPUAdreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU
6.578.46
Storage
262,14 MB internal memory16 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot
2.126.16
Camera
3.00 MP8.00 MP + 1.90 MP
--f/2.60 aperture
--0.33 inches (1/3") sensor
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
5.068.47
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA
SIMMicro SIM
15.6
Battery Life
1300mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--Wireless Charging
480 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
200 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
3.044
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 4.0
GPSGPS
--NFC
--Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Samsung Galaxy S III is a lot better than the Samsung Rugby III, having a 70.8 score against 41.9. Samsung Galaxy S III is a noticeably thinner phone than the Samsung Rugby III, but they weight 4.7oz. Galaxy S III features a much better looking display than Samsung Rugby III, because it has a much bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 1280 x 720px and a way higher screen pixels density.

The Galaxy S III counts with a much better performing CPU than Samsung Rugby III, because it has an extra GPU, a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S III counts with a much better camera than Samsung Rugby III, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.

Galaxy S III features a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Rugby III, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 64 GB and more internal memory. The Galaxy S III has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Rugby III, because it has a 2100mAh battery capacity against 1300mAh.

Galaxy S III costs a bit more than the Samsung Rugby III, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.