Search


Compare phones

Global Score
59.464.8
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
Android 2.3.5Android 9.0 Pie
2012-02-232019-06-10
4.82 x 2.59 x 0.48 inches6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches
4.20 ounces5.50 ounces
--Black
--Metal and Plastic
Scratch-Resistant GlassScratch-Resistant Glass
$ 140.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
3.7 inches5.5 inches
480 x 800 pixels 1440 x 720 pixels
Super AMOLEDIPS LCD
252 pixels per inch293 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.87.3
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset
Single-Core 1400 MHz processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
512 MB RAM2 GB RAM
Yes GPUAdreno 504 GPU
7.748.73
Storage
4 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
3.828.12
Camera
5.00 MP + 1.30 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
f/2.60 aperturef/2.00 aperture
1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.598.47
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
SIMNano SIM
46.1
Battery Life
1650mAh Li-Ion Battery2990mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
384 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
--
3.524.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia 3.1 A has an overall score of 64.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Rugby Smart's 59.4 global score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 3.1 A has newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Rugby Smart has Android 2.3.5 version, providing a lot of extra features. The Nokia 3.1 A is a much newer and notably thinner device than Samsung Rugby Smart, but it is heavier.

The Nokia 3.1 A features a quite superior performance than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and 1,5 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Rugby Smart features a bit more vivid display than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a really smaller display, a just a little lower pixels density and a lot lower 800 x 480 resolution.

The Nokia 3.1 A has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity.

Nokia 3.1 A has a better camera than Samsung Rugby Smart, because it has a much bigger aperture to capture better low light images, a way higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.

Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Nokia 3.1 A is also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.