Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-02-12 |
| 3.50 x 1.87 x 1.04 inches | 4.25 x 1.73 x 0.57 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 2.75 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 129.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| -- | 79 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 4.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 1,02 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 10.9 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.32 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W205 has a global score of 28.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung SCH-A630's score of 26.2. Motorola W205 is a much lighter and much thinner cellphone than the Samsung SCH-A630. The Motorola W205 has a lot better display than Samsung SCH-A630, although it has a little lower 128 x 128 resolution.
Motorola W205 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung SCH-A630. Motorola W205's processing unit is very similar to Samsung SCH-A630's processing unit, they have 0 CPU cores. The Motorola W205 counts with a camera that is just as good as Samsung SCH-A630's camera. Samsung SCH-A630 features longer battery performance than Motorola W205, because it has a 29 percent larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Motorola W205 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.