Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 3.50 x 1.87 x 1.04 inches | 4.37 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| -- | 113 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.48 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W230 has a general score of 28.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung SCH-A630's general score of 26.2. Motorola W230 is a extremely lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than the Samsung SCH-A630. Motorola W230 features a much sharper screen than Samsung SCH-A630, although it has a little bit worse 128 x 128 resolution.
The Motorola W230 features as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Samsung SCH-A630. Motorola W230 counts with a processor that is very similar to Samsung SCH-A630's processor, both of them have the same number of cores. Motorola W230's camera is just as good as the Samsung SCH-A630 one.
The Samsung SCH-A630 features a little better battery duration than Motorola W230, because it has a 1100mAh battery size.
Motorola W230 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.