Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 26.2 | 28.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 7.0 |
| -- | 2004-01-15 |
| 3.50 x 1.87 x 1.04 inches | 4.28 x 2.29 x 0.93 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 4.37 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 135.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 208 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 12,29 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | MMC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
The Nokia 6620 is slightly better than Samsung SCH-A630, having a 28.2 score against 26.2. Nokia 6620's body is thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung SCH-A630. Nokia 6620 has a screen that's just as good as the Samsung SCH-A630 one, although the Nokia 6620 also has a better 208 x 176 resolution.
The Nokia 6620 has a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung SCH-A630, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 32 GB. Nokia 6620 features a processing unit that's very similar to the Samsung SCH-A630 one, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. Samsung SCH-A630 counts with greater battery performance than Nokia 6620, because it has 1100mAh of battery capacity against 850mAh.
The Nokia 6620 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung SCH-A630.
The Nokia 6620 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.