Compare phones
Samsung SCH-A790
SCH-A795, SPH-A790, IP-A790Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 30 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-10-11 |
| 3.40 x 2.00 x 1.00 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 4.20 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3.1 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 10,24 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | -- |
| 3.63 | 0 |
| GSM and CDMA | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 141 hours standby time 2.9 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung SCH-A790 has a general score of 30, which is slightly better than Motorola W175's overall score of 28.6. The Samsung SCH-A790 design is notably thicker and noticeably heavier than the Motorola W175. The Motorola W175's processing unit is very similar to Samsung SCH-A790's processor, both of them have 0 cpu cores.
Motorola W175 features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung SCH-A790, although it has a lot worse 128 x 128 resolution. Samsung SCH-A790 features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola W175. The Motorola W175 counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung SCH-A790.
Samsung SCH-A790 captures greater videos and photos than Motorola W175.
The Samsung SCH-A790 costs exactly the same than Motorola W175, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.